<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Idol, the Enterprise, and Web 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.willmeyer.com/things/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/things/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30</link>
	<description>projects stuff, random stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 18:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nerd Meridian :: blog.pmarca.com is the cat's pajamas</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/things/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/comment-page-1#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Nerd Meridian :: blog.pmarca.com is the cat's pajamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>[...] on web 2.0, and bubbles, from someone who&#8217;s been there &#8212; we agree web 2.0 is more about getting into the groove of what web 1.0 really is (I&#8217;ve had various takes on this, including this devil&#8217;s advocate argument) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on web 2.0, and bubbles, from someone who&#8217;s been there &#8212; we agree web 2.0 is more about getting into the groove of what web 1.0 really is (I&#8217;ve had various takes on this, including this devil&#8217;s advocate argument) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/things/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/comment-page-1#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Thanks v much for the thoughtful comment.  I&#039;m on board with the long tail,  and the conventional arguments about the opening of the opportunity space through decreasing costs (capex and otherwise), decentralized/viral marketing capability, etc.  First-hand, certainly the barriers to entry being so low is one of the reasons we could have some fun with Cruxy.com.  This openness is why it&#039;s such a fun time.

But, the point I&#039;m making here is more about that pesky front part of the long tail, which is still there, and even though in the aggregate the long end is bigger, in terms of an individual experience, it isn&#039;t necessarily.  In other words, while there are doubtless oodles of cool things to get excited about in web 2.0 land, and tens if not hundreds of tools that we all use individually fairly regularly, the ways in which the vast majority of regular old users experience media and entertainment are much more a function of that front part than sometimes we think.  In any case, I&#039;m still playing devil&#039;s advocate, just trying to inject a dose of skepticism occasionally into the discussion.

Lots of really really smart people in the world are perfectly happy going to 5 different websites 95% of the time.  Let&#039;s see where we are in a year -- I&#039;d be surprised if this &quot;rich-getting-richer&quot; traffic allocation to the top sites reverses directions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks v much for the thoughtful comment.  I&#8217;m on board with the long tail,  and the conventional arguments about the opening of the opportunity space through decreasing costs (capex and otherwise), decentralized/viral marketing capability, etc.  First-hand, certainly the barriers to entry being so low is one of the reasons we could have some fun with Cruxy.com.  This openness is why it&#8217;s such a fun time.</p>
<p>But, the point I&#8217;m making here is more about that pesky front part of the long tail, which is still there, and even though in the aggregate the long end is bigger, in terms of an individual experience, it isn&#8217;t necessarily.  In other words, while there are doubtless oodles of cool things to get excited about in web 2.0 land, and tens if not hundreds of tools that we all use individually fairly regularly, the ways in which the vast majority of regular old users experience media and entertainment are much more a function of that front part than sometimes we think.  In any case, I&#8217;m still playing devil&#8217;s advocate, just trying to inject a dose of skepticism occasionally into the discussion.</p>
<p>Lots of really really smart people in the world are perfectly happy going to 5 different websites 95% of the time.  Let&#8217;s see where we are in a year &#8212; I&#8217;d be surprised if this &#8220;rich-getting-richer&#8221; traffic allocation to the top sites reverses directions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/things/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/comment-page-1#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-352</guid>
		<description>I appreciate making the interesting list, but I couldn&#039;t disagree more with your premise. The global move to consumer broadband is lowering costs and barriers to entry across the board, eroding opportunities for Economies of Scale in information businesses. The economic drivers that make consolidation the natural result of technology maturation are diminishing. There will be more smaller online businesses that last longer and which are *in aggregate* able to operate more profitably than their larger brethren.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate making the interesting list, but I couldn&#8217;t disagree more with your premise. The global move to consumer broadband is lowering costs and barriers to entry across the board, eroding opportunities for Economies of Scale in information businesses. The economic drivers that make consolidation the natural result of technology maturation are diminishing. There will be more smaller online businesses that last longer and which are *in aggregate* able to operate more profitably than their larger brethren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

