<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nerd Meridian</title>
	<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog</link>
	<description>Or the evening geekiness in the East</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fight of the Conchords === Funny by Natty</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/09/02/fight-of-the-conchords-funny/#comment-475</link>
		<author>Natty</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/09/02/fight-of-the-conchords-funny/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Here are two more classic videos from their show...

"Hiphopopotamus vs. Rhymenoceros"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=FArZxLj6DLk&#38;mode=related&#38;search=

and of course "Frodo - Don't Wear the Ring!"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are two more classic videos from their show&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hiphopopotamus vs. Rhymenoceros&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=FArZxLj6DLk&amp;mode=related&amp;search=" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=FArZxLj6DLk&amp;mode=related&amp;search=</a></p>
<p>and of course &#8220;Frodo - Don&#8217;t Wear the Ring!&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Excellence as memorial by Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/09/01/excellence-as-memorial/#comment-471</link>
		<author>Sam</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/09/01/excellence-as-memorial/#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Hey Will, congrats! Didn't know you were over at Clearspring. Give me a shout sometime soon

-Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Will, congrats! Didn&#8217;t know you were over at Clearspring. Give me a shout sometime soon</p>
<p>-Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Idol, the Enterprise, and Web 3.0 by Nerd Meridian :: blog.pmarca.com is the cat's pajamas</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-19</link>
		<author>Nerd Meridian :: blog.pmarca.com is the cat's pajamas</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] on web 2.0, and bubbles, from someone who&#8217;s been there &#8212; we agree web 2.0 is more about getting into the groove of what web 1.0 really is (I&#8217;ve had various takes on this, including this devil&#8217;s advocate argument) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] on web 2.0, and bubbles, from someone who&#8217;s been there &#8212; we agree web 2.0 is more about getting into the groove of what web 1.0 really is (I&#8217;ve had various takes on this, including this devil&#8217;s advocate argument) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s the Telco in Web 2.0? by Nerd Meridian :: On Facebook, Widgets, Apps, and APIs</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/24/wheres-the-telco-in-web-20/#comment-18</link>
		<author>Nerd Meridian :: On Facebook, Widgets, Apps, and APIs</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/24/wheres-the-telco-in-web-20/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] account is impacted. This is the right gamble to make, kudos to them for doing it &#8212; the carriers could learn a thing or two about balancing control and openness from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] account is impacted. This is the right gamble to make, kudos to them for doing it &#8212; the carriers could learn a thing or two about balancing control and openness from [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oh, Sir Paul&#8230; by Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/06/05/oh-sir-paul/#comment-17</link>
		<author>Burns</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/06/05/oh-sir-paul/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>BTW, "London Town" was a great album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, &#8220;London Town&#8221; was a great album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oh, Sir Paul&#8230; by Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/06/05/oh-sir-paul/#comment-16</link>
		<author>Burns</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/06/05/oh-sir-paul/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Yes, had to suppress a major shudder of revulsion when I saw the SP CD at SB doing his best Dr.-Robert-from-The-Blow-Monkeys impression one-quarter century after the 10.5 seconds after it was cool to do that.  Also, it’s pretty hipster to be embarrassed about going into a SB, isn’t it?  Isn't it??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, had to suppress a major shudder of revulsion when I saw the SP CD at SB doing his best Dr.-Robert-from-The-Blow-Monkeys impression one-quarter century after the 10.5 seconds after it was cool to do that.  Also, it’s pretty hipster to be embarrassed about going into a SB, isn’t it?  Isn&#8217;t it??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Idol, the Enterprise, and Web 3.0 by Will</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-15</link>
		<author>Will</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Thanks v much for the thoughtful comment.  I'm on board with the long tail,  and the conventional arguments about the opening of the opportunity space through decreasing costs (capex and otherwise), decentralized/viral marketing capability, etc.  First-hand, certainly the barriers to entry being so low is one of the reasons we could have some fun with Cruxy.com.  This openness is why it's such a fun time.  

But, the point I'm making here is more about that pesky front part of the long tail, which is still there, and even though in the aggregate the long end is bigger, in terms of an individual experience, it isn't necessarily.  In other words, while there are doubtless oodles of cool things to get excited about in web 2.0 land, and tens if not hundreds of tools that we all use individually fairly regularly, the ways in which the vast majority of regular old users experience media and entertainment are much more a function of that front part than sometimes we think.  In any case, I'm still playing devil's advocate, just trying to inject a dose of skepticism occasionally into the discussion.  

Lots of really really smart people in the world are perfectly happy going to 5 different websites 95% of the time.  Let's see where we are in a year -- I'd be surprised if this "rich-getting-richer" traffic allocation to the top sites reverses directions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks v much for the thoughtful comment.  I&#8217;m on board with the long tail,  and the conventional arguments about the opening of the opportunity space through decreasing costs (capex and otherwise), decentralized/viral marketing capability, etc.  First-hand, certainly the barriers to entry being so low is one of the reasons we could have some fun with Cruxy.com.  This openness is why it&#8217;s such a fun time.  </p>
<p>But, the point I&#8217;m making here is more about that pesky front part of the long tail, which is still there, and even though in the aggregate the long end is bigger, in terms of an individual experience, it isn&#8217;t necessarily.  In other words, while there are doubtless oodles of cool things to get excited about in web 2.0 land, and tens if not hundreds of tools that we all use individually fairly regularly, the ways in which the vast majority of regular old users experience media and entertainment are much more a function of that front part than sometimes we think.  In any case, I&#8217;m still playing devil&#8217;s advocate, just trying to inject a dose of skepticism occasionally into the discussion.  </p>
<p>Lots of really really smart people in the world are perfectly happy going to 5 different websites 95% of the time.  Let&#8217;s see where we are in a year &#8212; I&#8217;d be surprised if this &#8220;rich-getting-richer&#8221; traffic allocation to the top sites reverses directions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Idol, the Enterprise, and Web 3.0 by Scott Rafer</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-14</link>
		<author>Scott Rafer</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/29/american-idol-the-enterprise-and-web-30/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I appreciate making the interesting list, but I couldn't disagree more with your premise. The global move to consumer broadband is lowering costs and barriers to entry across the board, eroding opportunities for Economies of Scale in information businesses. The economic drivers that make consolidation the natural result of technology maturation are diminishing. There will be more smaller online businesses that last longer and which are *in aggregate* able to operate more profitably than their larger brethren.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate making the interesting list, but I couldn&#8217;t disagree more with your premise. The global move to consumer broadband is lowering costs and barriers to entry across the board, eroding opportunities for Economies of Scale in information businesses. The economic drivers that make consolidation the natural result of technology maturation are diminishing. There will be more smaller online businesses that last longer and which are *in aggregate* able to operate more profitably than their larger brethren.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Platforms Come to Web 2.0 by Will</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/25/real-platforms-come-to-web-20/#comment-5</link>
		<author>Will</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/25/real-platforms-come-to-web-20/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Oren, great to hear!  I think that's a killer strategy...in terms of reach and more importantly in terms of revenue potential.  Good luck taking it forward!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Oren, great to hear!  I think that&#8217;s a killer strategy&#8230;in terms of reach and more importantly in terms of revenue potential.  Good luck taking it forward!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Platforms Come to Web 2.0 by Oren Michels</title>
		<link>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/25/real-platforms-come-to-web-20/#comment-4</link>
		<author>Oren Michels</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.willmeyer.com/blog/2007/05/25/real-platforms-come-to-web-20/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi, Will - 

Thanks for the kind words about Mashery and our segment. How does your view figure into our plans? Quite strongly, in fact. We see the enterprise market you describe as being an excellent opportunity, and believe that Mashery's services (present and future) will help fill the gap you describe. I do like your analogy to open source; I think it is an apt one.

Cheers -

Oren Michels
CEO
Mashery</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Will - </p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words about Mashery and our segment. How does your view figure into our plans? Quite strongly, in fact. We see the enterprise market you describe as being an excellent opportunity, and believe that Mashery&#8217;s services (present and future) will help fill the gap you describe. I do like your analogy to open source; I think it is an apt one.</p>
<p>Cheers -</p>
<p>Oren Michels<br />
CEO<br />
Mashery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
